Christianity QA

Question:

EW-  I read it,you mean Dolf s concise and cogent statements don,t immediately illuminate your mind to his subtle truth?   Whoa! I think he is beyond having to smoke anything,I think the smoke is being constantly generated from between his ears!LE DOLF BOEK RESPONDS: The problem appears to be with Dogmatic Christians capacity within Grace for doublemindedness and throughout it all a seemingly faultless capacity to arbitrate upon the spiritual worth of others from the sensuality of their own cultural claim to a spiritual experience [Romans 10:6-8] :– [The Octahedron afteral shares a relationship with the Cube (Hexahedron) http://www.users.bigpond.com/dolfboek/octahedron.html#MITHRA NOTE: If the Apostle Paul was declared by Jesus to be the Chosen Vessel [Acts 9:15-22] to bear the gospel to the world, it would appear that the Catholic church’s claim of this office for Peter is fraudulent and so too the Dodecahedron (6,000 years = 120J + 120 [2J 3W 1D] ie 50 x 120 http://www.users.bigpond.com/dolfboek/potpourri.html#SENSE ) shares a Tetractys [72J] + pi [3W + 1D] http://www.users.bigpond.com/dolfboek/checksum.html#EXILE NOTE:  The Hebrews celebrated each fiftieth year as a Jubilee year calling it the ‘Power of the Number Twelve’ (3+4+5) Romans 1:18-32] Whilst there is also acceptance (a belief about what God says of Himself) that Grace is merited by God’s forebearance [Romans 3:21-26], where is this character of God as ‘righteousness-dikaiosune, just-dikaios and justifier-dikaioo’ which Dogmatic Christians claim as theirs? The Religionist may say, "I never claimed to have ‘a spiritual life of a Christian as a good and faithful servant’!" Now I know that the membership don’t claim knowledge (Gnosis) of God as the basis of their religious experience. That is self-evident by their relative incapacity to discourse on Knowledge-gnosis of God. It does not progress beyond the nurtured sensuality of [s]wallowing a universally ignorant, self-pitying and sentimental lament, which is nothing more than a sensualism perpetuated against the Spiritual Life of the Individual [Romans 2:26-29], as Institutional religious fraud in denial of the fundamental and individual human right to freedom from coercion on ‘thought, conscience and belief’. [Hebrews 8:7-13; Jeremiah 31:31-37] "For when you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness. What fruit did you have then in the things of which you are now ashamed? For the end of those things is death. But now having been set free from sin, and having become slaves of God, you have your fruit to holiness, and the end, everlasting life. For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord." [Romans 6:20-23] Why is it you can’t talk about God without restorting to a sensualism?  And how is it you can you be so certain that your name written in the Book of Life? – dolf —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups – 16 Different Servers! =—–

Response:

Dear Dolf, your repartitious arguements get muddled in too many words, you need to be precise and also concise in your arguments, that they can be understood by all!!!! this is just a suggestion, mind you, this is your choice!!! DOLF BOEK RESPONDS: It’s my guess that those who have the Son have Logos and those who don’t have alogos… Clearly, the Apostle Paul warns of a ‘different-heteros gospel-euaggelion’ [2 Corinthians 11:1-6] as pointless and deceptive idle talk-mataiologos [1 Timothy 1:6] made by those who desire to be teachers-nomodidaskalos of the law-nomodidaskalos. In so doing, he expresses something of the ‘faith-pistis’ which encapsulates what it means to being a Christian, as being more than ‘rights-exousia’ and privileges associated with heterosexuality. While there may be many different norms whose transgression is described in the term ‘mataios’, as the different instruction which is taught (heterodidaskaleo) [1 Timothy 1:3] and accepted, it is generally not the ethical or intellectual norm which predominantly controls the word and gives it distinctiveness. The peculiarity of the term is that it retains its comprehensive metaphysical undertone and hence its pagan association with the old Greek cabalistic name of the Sun, ‘Damnamenos {=katanank

Related Posts